入力内容
これらの数値は法定上限です。実際の執行は異なります。規制当局は意図、協力姿勢、過去の経緯、緩和策を考慮します。
インド DPDPA 1件の違反にわたって に基づく法定上限
インド DPDPAの罰則内訳
- ₹250 crore - 合理的なセキュリティ保護措置の不履行(第8条(5))
- ₹200 crore - 個人データ侵害の通知義務違反(第8条(6))
- ₹200 crore - 子どものデータに関する義務違反(第9条)
- ₹150 crore - Significant Data Fiduciaryの義務(第10条)
- ₹50 crore - その他の規定の違反
包括的なコンプライアンスプログラムの費用は通常最大罰則リスクの1～3%であり、残りのリスクを回避できます。
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this calculator show?+
It illustrates the statutory maximum penalty under the regime you select, based on the revenue, violation and record figures you enter. It is an illustration of the legal ceiling, not a prediction of any outcome.
Which regimes are covered?+
GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, India's DPDPA and Brazil's LGPD. Each uses its own basis — turnover percentages, fixed caps or per-record amounts — which is why the same inputs produce very different figures.
Why is the result so much higher than fines I've read about?+
Because statutory maximums are ceilings, not typical outcomes. Actual enforcement depends on the nature and gravity of the infringement, mitigation, cooperation, prior history and the regulator's own methodology.
Why does the CCPA figure depend on record counts?+
CCPA/CPRA exposure is assessed per affected record, with a higher amount where a violation is intentional, rather than as a percentage of turnover. That is why the calculator asks for affected records separately.
Can I use this for budgeting or board reporting?+
Use it to frame the scale of exposure, not as a forecast. The breakdown notes that a full compliance programme typically costs a small fraction of the statutory maximum, which is the more useful comparison for planning.
Is this legal advice?+
No. As the disclaimer on this page states, the calculator illustrates statutory maximums for orientation. For an assessment of your actual exposure, obtain advice from appropriately qualified counsel.