Skip to main content

合规处罚计算器

估算您在GDPR、CCPA/CPRA、DPDPA、UK GDPR和LGPD下的最高处罚风险。适用于高管沟通和预算审批。

您的输入项

11 次违规10+

这些数字为法定上限。实际执法情况各异--监管机构会考虑意图、配合程度、过往记录和补救措施。

估计的最高风险敞口
₹250 crore

印度DPDPA下的法定上限 涵盖 1 次违规

每次违规上限₹250 crore

印度DPDPA 的处罚明细

  • 25亿卢比--未采取合理安全保障措施(第8(5)条)
  • 20亿卢比--未通报个人数据泄露(第8(6)条)
  • 20亿卢比--违反儿童数据义务(第9条)
  • 15亿卢比--重要数据受托人义务(第10条)
  • 5亿卢比--违反任何其他规定

一个完整的合规计划通常成本为最高处罚风险的1–3%--并可避免其余部分。

免责声明:本计算器仅说明法定处罚上限。它不构成法律建议,实际罚款取决于监管机构的自由裁量权、减轻因素和具体案情。货币未按汇率换算--数字反映各监管机构的本币单位。

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this calculator show?+

It illustrates the statutory maximum penalty under the regime you select, based on the revenue, violation and record figures you enter. It is an illustration of the legal ceiling, not a prediction of any outcome.

Which regimes are covered?+

GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, India's DPDPA and Brazil's LGPD. Each uses its own basis — turnover percentages, fixed caps or per-record amounts — which is why the same inputs produce very different figures.

Why is the result so much higher than fines I've read about?+

Because statutory maximums are ceilings, not typical outcomes. Actual enforcement depends on the nature and gravity of the infringement, mitigation, cooperation, prior history and the regulator's own methodology.

Why does the CCPA figure depend on record counts?+

CCPA/CPRA exposure is assessed per affected record, with a higher amount where a violation is intentional, rather than as a percentage of turnover. That is why the calculator asks for affected records separately.

Can I use this for budgeting or board reporting?+

Use it to frame the scale of exposure, not as a forecast. The breakdown notes that a full compliance programme typically costs a small fraction of the statutory maximum, which is the more useful comparison for planning.

Is this legal advice?+

No. As the disclaimer on this page states, the calculator illustrates statutory maximums for orientation. For an assessment of your actual exposure, obtain advice from appropriately qualified counsel.